Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Pridemore v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04627
Plaintiff:
William B. Pridemore
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PYLES v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04617
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Pyles and JOSEPH DAVID PYLES
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYERS v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv01347
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MYERS
Defendant:
C R BARD INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKENNA v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv01346
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
GERTHA MCKENNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv01280
Plaintiff:
TONI HINES
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Head v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00176
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN HEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matter v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01593
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Matter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04302
Plaintiff:
Diana Long
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oxenreider v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01595
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Oxenreider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuzek v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01591
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Zuzek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
