Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Vincent Rivera v. Apalachee CI Warden, et al
as 11-14516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
APALACHEE CI WARDEN, JOHN A. BARFIELD, Assistant Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution, C. G. ATKINS, Assistant Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution and others
CORCORAN v MCNEIL et al
as 5:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran and VINCENT RIVERA
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, JOHN PALMER, JOHN BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corcoran v. Rivera et al
as 3:2010cv01025
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran and Vincent Rivera
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, John Palmer, John Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2010cv01951
Plaintiff:
Imhotep Jordan, Jr
Defendant:
John Mitchell, C G Butler, J J Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Palmer et al
as 1:2010cv22855
Plaintiff:
Vincent Rivera
Defendant:
John Palmer, John A. Barfield, C. G. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2010cv00005
Defendant:
CRAIG ANDRA MOORE, WALTER MCNEIL, JOHN PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ANDRA MOORE
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, JOHN PALMER, C G ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIEBLA v. BARFIELD et al
as 5:2009cv00054
Defendant:
JOHN A BARFIELD, C G ATKINS and JOHN M PALMER
Plaintiff:
JORGE L NIEBLA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eugene Hamilton v. L. Robles, et al
as 09-55082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
L. ROBLES, Medical Technical Assistant, M. MCNAIR, K. SAIZER and others
NIEBLA v. BARFIELD et al
as 5:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
JORGE L NIEBLA
Defendant:
J A BARFIELD, JOHN M PALMER and C G ATKINS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
