Cases 1 - 10 of 35
(PC) Davis v. Baines et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Omniko Davis
Defendant:
T. Baines, K. Kiev, J. Jemenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv01721
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, A. Leyva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 1:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, A. Leyva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Gonzalez v. Madden
as 1:2021cv00105
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Juan C Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Madden
as 3:2020cv09281
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Juan C Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen et al v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv07991
Plaintiff:
PHUONG T. NGUYEN, D.D.S.,INC doing business as LASER COSMETIC DENTISTRY, Phuong T. Nguyen and Phuong T. Nguyen, D.D.S., Inc. doing business as Laser Cosmetic Dentistry
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration, United States of America, Maria A. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
(PC) Johnson v. Pickering et al
as 1:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
S. Pickering, N. Telles, Y. Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Johnson v. Pickering et al
as 2:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
L Medina-Rojas, Sr., Y Montes, S Pickering and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria C. Gonzalez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 5:2019cv02205
Defendant:
Merill Lynch, Wells Fargo Bank and Sedgwick CMS
Plaintiff:
Maria Lerma, Maria C. Gonzalez, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
