Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
LOVE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12377
Plaintiff: SHAWNEL C LOVE
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVE v. SHOCKLEY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv07681
Plaintiff: ANDREW C. LOVE
Defendant: NIGEL SHOCKLEY , DANA R. PETRONE and CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE METRO DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. POLICE OFFICERS TO BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAINTIFF We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv07276
Plaintiff: ANDREW C. LOVE
Defendant: POLICE OFFICERS TO BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAINTIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. PROSECUTOR TO BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAINTIFF
as 1:2014cv07275
Plaintiff: ANDREW C. LOVE
Defendant: PROSECUTOR TO BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAINTIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE METRO DIVISION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv06780
Plaintiff: ANDREW C. LOVE
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE METRO DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. ARMSTRONG CORK CO. et al
as 2:2009cv63397
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE C. LOVE, LAWRENCE C. LOVE and LAWRENCE C. LOVE
Defendant: ARMSTRONG CORK CO., ARMSTRONG CORK CO., ARMSTRONG CORK CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BRANNAN et al v. COOPER INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv73711
Plaintiff: GEORGE J BRANNAN, HAM P CARNEY, WILLIAM E DAVIS and others
Defendant: COOPER INDUSTRIES, OGLEBAY NORTON CO., Riley Stoker Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?