Cases 1 - 10 of 30
(PC) Walker v. Gates et al
as 2:2020cv02338
Defendant:
Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, N. Malakkla, A Abdulbasel and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deaton v. Davey , et al.
as 1:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Joshua F. Deaton
Defendant:
D. Davey, Patricia Rouch, C. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. McCabe et al
as 1:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Abdullah Wright
Defendant:
C. McCabe, C. Bell, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua F. Deaton v. D. Davey et al
as 2:2018cv02969
Defendant:
T. Alaniz, T. Alaniz, D. Davey and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua F. Deaton
Wilson v. California State Prison Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Biter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garbarini v. Mendivil et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ralph Garbarini
Defendant:
D. Mendivil, Hernandez, Moniza Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv02532
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, L. Donnelly, A. Poythress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, L. Donnelly, A. Poythress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Kerman et al
as 2:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dennis
Defendant:
Scott Kerman, J. Clark Kelso, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorrough v. Chinnapa et al
as 1:2015cv01488
Plaintiff:
Michael Reed Dorrough
Defendant:
Nareddy Chinnapa, Huu Nguyen, Wayne Ulit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
