Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Anthony Robinson v. Dave Davey, et al
as 22-15391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden, Warden, CSP-Corcoran, C. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, A. V. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Bradford v. Ceballos et al
as 1:2020cv01821
Defendant:
D. Goree, Jr, J. Ceballos and C. Munoz
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Valdez-Perner et al
as 3:2020cv04801
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, K. Royal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Do Canto et al
as 1:2019cv00854
Defendant:
M. Mason, C. Munoz and M. Do Canto
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harris v. Parks et al
as 1:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Hackworth, A. Madrigal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branlett Eugene Kimmons v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2019cv00561
Defendant:
C. Munoz, T. Ellis, Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Branlett Eugene Kimmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Camargo et al
as 1:2019cv00266
Defendant:
D. Saucedo, C. Munoz, E. Cerda and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Davey et al
as 1:2017cv01524
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Robinson
Defendant:
Dave Davey, C. Munoz, A. V. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Cohea v. J. Faldon, et al
as 17-15663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Defendant - Appellee:
J. FALDON, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, J. D. LOZANO, Chief of Inmate Appeals, Sacramento, CA, R. PIMENTAL, Appeals Examiner, Sacramento, CA and others
Danny James Cohea v. Faldon et al
as 1:2016cv00955
Defendant:
J. Faldon, J.D. Lozano, R. Pimental and others
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
