Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eve Doe v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04896
Plaintiff:
Eve Doe
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jane Doe et al v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04723
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Does 1 through 64
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Immanuel Price v. B. Sanchez, et al
as 20-16225
Defendant / Appellee:
ALTON WEATHERSPOON, Inmate #T4453, B. SANCHEZ, R. BUCKEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMMANUEL CHRISTIAN PRICE, AKA Immanuel C. Price
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. ASH et al
as 2:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Dewayn, Danielle Paladino, David Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2019cv04690
Defendant:
Alton Weatherspoon, B. Sanchez and I. Law
Plaintiff:
Immanuel C. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Immanuel Price v. Lamb, et al
as 18-16681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IMMANUEL CHRISTIAN PRICE, AKA Immanuel C. Price
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMB, Correctional Counselor and RAMIREZ, RN
Immanuel Price v. M. Wright, et al
as 18-16682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IMMANUEL CHRISTIAN PRICE, AKA Immanuel C. Price
Defendant - Appellee:
M. WRIGHT, RN and CHAMPION, Sergeant
Immanuel Price v. Scott Kernan
as 18-55612
Petitioner - Appellant:
IMMANUEL CHRISTIAN PRICE, AKA Immanuel C. Price
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
