Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ellis v. Price et al
as 2:2016cv01178
Plaintiff: Davon L Ellis
Defendant: C Price, DOC Comm, Leon Bolling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00518
Plaintiff: Christopher Dale Banks
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections and C Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConico v. Price et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00320
Petitioner: James McConico, Jr.
Respondent: C Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv01605
Plaintiff: Christopher D Banks
Defendant: C Price, Russell, Olds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Price
as 2:2014cv01098
Plaintiff: Christopher D Banks
Defendant: C Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Price
as 2:2014cv00418
Plaintiff: James Lee Wallace
Defendant: C Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
German v. Penfield et al
as 5:2013cv02079
Plaintiff: Shermaine A German
Defendant: Russell E Penfield, C Price, William E Donaldson Correctional Facility and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01901
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Banks
Defendant: C Price
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turney v. Alabama State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01100
Petitioner: Calvin Turney
Respondent: Alabama State of and C Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. State of Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00102
Petitioner: Major Anderson
Respondent: State of Alabama, C Price and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?