Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eve Doe v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04896
Plaintiff:
Eve Doe
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jane Doe et al v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04723
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Does 1 through 64
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. ASH et al
as 2:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Dewayn, Danielle Paladino, David Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2019cv04690
Defendant:
Alton Weatherspoon, B. Sanchez and I. Law
Plaintiff:
Immanuel C. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fkadu v. Price
as 3:2017cv02560
Petitioner:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Respondent:
Stirling C. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berihu Fkadu v. Sterling C. Price et al
as 2:2017cv04658
Respondent:
Chand, Dawn Donovan, Mr. Mason M. Nutter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu H. Fkadu
Fkadu v. Price et al
as 3:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Berihu H. Fkadu
Defendant:
Stirling C. Price, S. Yakhu, Marilou Rosas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fkadu v. Price
as 3:2017cv00745
Petitioner:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Respondent:
Stirling C. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
