Cases 61 - 70 of 21,375
Johnston v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
George Johnston
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Day v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Day
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santoro v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Frank Santoro
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Liesha Young
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Earl Douglas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Frith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tate et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
James E. Tate and Angela H. Tate
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quigley et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Bradley Quigley and Jane Quingley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crisp v. Covidien LP, et al
as 1:2024cv10273
Plaintiff:
Peggy Crisp
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Bard Davol, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gail v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Lori Gail
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
