Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Antonetti v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Defendant:
C.C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Rimer v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY RIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, JENNIFER NASH, TIMOTHY FILSON and others
Chilton v. Aranas et al
as 2:2016cv00975
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Romero Aranas, Jake Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Chilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chilton v. Aranas et al
as 2:2016cv00173
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Romero Aranas, Jake Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Chilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gorum v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Barth, Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gorum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iniguez v. Aranas et al
as 2:2015cv01659
Defendant:
Linda Adams, Romeo Aranas, R. Bruce Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Iniguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Marshall v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv01090
Defendant:
Adams, Aranas, Calderwood and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redeker v. The State of Nevada ex rel The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00927
Defendant:
Linda Adams, R. Aranas, Bruce R Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Arie Redeker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Banks v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2015cv00187
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Associate Warden of High Desert State Prison, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Foster et al
as 3:2014cv00495
Defendant:
C. C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
