Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Gregor (PS) v. C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2026cv03300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
C.D.O.C., ACF, FCF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall (PS) v. Stancill et al
as 1:2026cv02333
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Hall
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Andre Stancill, Bashere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregor (PS) v. Bennet et al.
as 1:2025cv03462
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Bennet, Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2025cv02875
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Hall and Nicholas Jason Hall
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Andre Stancil, Motes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregor (PS) v. C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv03416
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Hanson, Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv03061
Defendant:
James, C.D.O.C./ Moses (Andre) Stancil, Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Stancil
as 24-1139
Petitioner:
GARY L. BALDWIN
Respondent:
MOSES STANCIL, C.D.O.C. Executive Director
Gregor (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, C.D.O.C Administrative Offcials, Moses Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson (PS) v. Rollo et al
as 1:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Terance DeJuan Wilson
Defendant:
Rollo, BVCF Warden, Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lornes v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv02730
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
Johnson, White, Donald Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
