Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Chubb European Group Ltd. v. C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Chubb European Group Ltd.
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson International, Inc. doing business as CHRistal Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. v. M/V ONE APUS et al
as 1:2022cv05221
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson International Inc. doing business as Christal Lines
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Continental Insurance Company et al v. C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Continental Insurance Company and Affiliated FM Insurance Company
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson International, Inc. doing business as Christal Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. v. M/V ONE APUS et al
as 2:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Intl. Inc. d/b/a Christal Lines and C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. doing business as CHRISTAL LINES
Defendant:
M/V ONE OPUS, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Continental Insurance Company et al v. C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
as 0:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Continental Insurance Company and Affiliated FM Insurance Company
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson International, Inc. d/b/a CHRistal Lines and C.H. Robinson International, Inc. doing business as CHRistal Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Rimac Seguros Y Reaseguros et al v. C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
as 0:2021cv01288
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson International, Inc. doing business as CHRistal Lines
Plaintiff:
Rimac Seguros Y Reaseguros, Hensley Industries, Inc., Distribuidora Cummins Peru SAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
