Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KRAUSS et al V. IRIS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. KRAUSS , CINDY G. BRILLMAN , FIGHT BACK and others
Defendant:
IRIS USA, INC. , KV LOAD, INC. and C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUDZOWSKI et al v. S.E. LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02369
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. BUDZOWSKI , MARK PALMER , DAVID R. DICKENS and others
Defendant:
S.E. LOGISTICS, INC., STANISLAW J. ZYGMONT, EWA W. EHRLICH and others
Cross_claimant:
MAINFREIGHT, INC.
Cross_defendant:
APEX ENGINEERING PRODUCTS , C.H. ROBINSON COMPANY , C.H. ROBINSON COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELLETRON CORPORATION v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 5:2011cv06944
Plaintiff:
PELLETRON CORPORATION
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
Auman et al v. Joslyn et al
as 4:2009cv02371
Plaintiff:
Henry Auman, Henry Auman, Henry Auman and others
Defendant:
Bruce A. Joslyn and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GUENTHER et al v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 2:2007cv00495
Plaintiff:
WALLACE KIP GUENTHER, MICHAEL SELL and JAMES B. NAPOLEON
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALKER et al v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 2:2007cv01355
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. WALKER, MATTHEW D. KEIM, SCOTT Y.L. YEE and others
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MAKI et al v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 2:2007cv01238
Plaintiff:
RICHELLE MAKI, SARAH H. SNEERINGER, ARCHIE DEACON and others
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
