Cases 1 - 10 of 28,532
St. Onge v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04284
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward St. Onge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grim v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Heidi Grim
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIFE v. ANGIODYNAMICS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS INC, ANGIODYNAMICS INC and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Rife
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flint et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04235
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randall Flint and Keri Flint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patel v. C.R. Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv03438
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Incorporated, Unknown Parties and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kamini Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vetter, II v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04229
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Vetter, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
R.C. individually and on behalf of C.R. v. Google LLC et al
as 4:2024cv08687
Plaintiff:
R.C. individually and on behalf of C.R.
Defendant:
Google LLC and YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. C.R. Kraus
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
C.R. KRAUS, a/k/a Christopher Kraus
Shoopman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04210
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shoopman
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ambrose v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Ambrose
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
