Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Kandah v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10079
Plaintiff:
Justin Kandah
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kovalak v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01083
Plaintiff:
Sherry Kovalak
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carlson and Renee Carlson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., C.R.Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00386
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marenger et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Glenn Marenger and Penny Marenger
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheeler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00177
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melinda Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goshorn v. C. R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00857
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, McKesson Corporation, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Goshorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmiter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00796
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Palmiter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holevinski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00795
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holevinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aumiller et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Janene L Aumiller, Lyndol Aumiller and Janene L. Aumiller
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
