Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Lerch et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00489
Plaintiff: Ralph Lerch and Karen Lerch
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lerch et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00130
Plaintiff: Ralph Lerch and Karen Lerch
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Worley et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00420
Plaintiff: Helen Joan Worley and Horace L. Worley
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00826
Plaintiff: PATRICIA CLARK and ROBERT CLARK
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guild v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00251
Plaintiff: Thomas D Guild
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garner v. Vradelis et al
as 4:2009cv00021
Plaintiff: Carla Jo Garner
Defendant: Thomas Vradelis, Carteret OBGYN Associates, P.A., John Miklos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
GRISHAM v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00920
Plaintiff: ROBERT GRISHAM
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CARNS v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00669
Plaintiff: JOSEPH CARNS
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Aaron v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00109
Plaintiff: Harold S. Aaron
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
BILLINGS v. DAVOL INC.
as 1:2008cv00170
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BILLINGS
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?