Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tuggle v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv07146
Plaintiff:
Steven Ramon Tuggle
Defendant:
Robert J. Johnson, Price, Rightmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Cramer v. Laurie Smith, et al
as 20-17169
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MCGRATH, Warden PBSP, T. RUSSEL, AD SEG PROP STAFF PBSP, S. KERNAN, Secretary Calif. Dept. Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CRAMER
Cramer v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01700
Plaintiff:
James A. Cramer
Defendant:
Laurie Smith, S. Kernan, C. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Lyman v. Steven Cambra, Jr., et al
as 12-56136
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN BLAIN LYMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN CAMBRA, Jr. and STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edward Thomas v. A. LaMarque, et al
as 09-15879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. A. LAMARQUE, ARTHUR CALDERON, K. MYLER and others
Morando v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Ochoa Morando
Defendant:
F. Gonzalez, Steven Cambra, Jr and Scott P. Rawers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sheets v. Terhune et al
as 1:2008cv01056
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dean Sheets
Defendant:
C. A. Terhune, Jose Ramon Garcia, Edward M. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Crummel v. Steven Cambra, Jr., et al
as 08-56003
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LEE CRUMMEL
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN CAMBRA, Jr., Director Department of Corrections, LARRY D. SMITH, Sheriff, Riverside County and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General State of California
Jackson v. Hornung, et al
as 3:2001cv00337
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California and Steven Cambra, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Cambra
as 3:1997cv02316
Petitioner:
Donald Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
Steven Cambra, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
