Cases 91 - 100 of 804
CONWAY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2016cv09550
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CONWAY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09518
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE D. BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09490
Plaintiff:
CYRUS FRAZIER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEIRMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09432
Plaintiff:
MARIA WEIRMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROOVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09428
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOSEPH GROOVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STEPHEN PRATT, BRYAN CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWNS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY DOWNS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09391
Plaintiff:
SHARON ANN POWERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUTEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09350
Plaintiff:
HENRY TUTEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09352
Plaintiff:
DAWN M BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARRICK v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09351
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WARRICK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
