Cases 121 - 130 of 804
PETERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09004
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W. PETERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv08958
Plaintiff:
NATHAN INGRAM
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08973
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE JENKINS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv08957
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CANNON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOTH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08953
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. BOOTH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANUTTI v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08952
Plaintiff:
KELLY LYNN LANUTTI
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08972
Plaintiff:
RASHEED MOORE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08919
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. MURRAY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08888
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH LITTLES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BRANDON HOPPS and WILLY FURNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08867
Plaintiff:
TARON BAILEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
