Cases 51 - 60 of 780
DAVIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SAMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WELCH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
GLADWIN RUSSELL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T. HALL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SKINNER v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv00621
Plaintiff:
ERIC C. SKINNER
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, WARDEN OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ST. JOHN v. KRIMMEL et al
as 1:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOSEPH ST. JOHN
Defendant:
JOHN KRIMMEL, THOMAS HAVERS, STEPHEN PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORTUNA v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
WILSON FORTUNA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALCEDO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00374
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY SALCEDO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
RASHEED MARTIN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
