Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Ruth Minner, et al
as 08-2379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PIERCE, JAMES WELSH and CORR MED SER
Defendant:
RUTH ANN MINNER, CARL C. DANBERG, JOHN CARNEY and others
Andrus v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daryl Andrus
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Lawrence McDonald, Frederick VanDusen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
