Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Chantal Attias, et al v. CareFirst, Inc., et al
as 16-7108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chantal Attias, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Richard Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Latanya Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Carefirst, Inc., doing business as Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., doing business as Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., doing business as Carefirst Bluecross Blueshield, doing business as Carefirst Bluechoice, Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., doing business as Carefirst Bluecross Blueshield, doing business as Carefirst Bluechoice, Carefirst Bluechoice, doing business as Carefirst Bluecross Blueshield, doing business as Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., doing business as Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. and others
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 0:2016mc62086
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross, Natures Path Foods, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. d/b/a Empire BlueCross BlueShield and/or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc, Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Sovereign Health of Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Houston Metro Ortho and Spine Surgery Center LLC v. Health Care Service Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
Houston Metro Ortho and Spine Surgery Center LLC
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Richmond SA Services, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00774
Plaintiff:
Richmond SA Services, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc , Fortbend SA Services, Inc. , National SA Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as TXS/4:16-cv-01146
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc , Fortbend SA Services, Inc. , National SA Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Richmond SA Services, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as TXS/4:16-cv-01140
Plaintiff:
Richmond SA Services, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as 2:2015cv02296
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as TXS/4:15-cv-03491
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as 4:2015cv03491
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
