Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Malibu Behavioral Health Services, Inc. v. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Malibu Behavioral Health Services, Inc. doing business as South California Road to Recovery
Defendant:
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. doing business as CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield and CareFirst BlueChoice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. v. CareFirst Health Care Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02369
Plaintiff:
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. doing business as CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
Defendant:
CareFirst Health Care Services, LLC and Charles Ajuzie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Stanford Health Care v. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.
as 5:2022cv06041
Petitioner:
Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation and Stanford Health Care
Defendant:
CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC., dba CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. doing business as CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2021cv02805
Counter Defendant:
JANE SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
CORAM CVS SPECIALTY INFUSION SERVICES, CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD, GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Aton Center v. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03170
Defendant:
Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., CareFirst BlueChoice, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aton Center and Aton Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
