Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Tucker v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00552
Petitioner:
Carlos Antonio Tucker
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arkulari v. State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office and Carlos Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LeFever v. Neb. State Patrol et al
as 4:2020cv03068
Defendant:
Neb. State Patrol and Carlos Trevino
Plaintiff:
Luke LeFever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliveira-Coutinho v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00491
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Oliveira-Coutinho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz-Cervantes v. USA
as 8:2019cv00161
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roberto Carlos Ortiz-Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ordonez Velazquez et al v. The United States of America et al
as 8:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Arriaga Guzman and Elba Alicia Ordonez Velazquez
Defendant:
The United States of America, John or Jane Doe, Carlos Vanegas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Vidal-Mix v. USA
as 8:2018cv00172
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Vidal-Mix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
