Cases 21 - 30 of 87
MEDLOCK v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv08162
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MEDLOCK
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VERGARA v. THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL et al
as 2:2020cv01668
Defendant:
THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL, JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
YESENIA VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VERGARA v. THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL et al
as 3:2020cv01668
Defendant:
THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL, JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
YESENIA VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv21238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CARLTON v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE CASINO HOTEL et al
as 1:2019cv19613
Defendant:
DETECTIVE F. HOLMES, BALLY'S PARK PLACE CASINO HOTEL, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL CARLTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURMER et al v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv19259
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. BANDA, BRUCE L JENNINGS, JOEL E. DURMER and others
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON, MARCUS O. HICKS, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 2:2019cv16992
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MRS. CARLTON JOSEPH AUSTIN and CARLTON AUSTIN
Defendant:
PFS FINANCIAL 1 LLC, CITY OF NEWARK and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CARLTON v. KELSEY
as 1:2019cv13357
Petitioner:
JAMEL ANTHONY CARLTON
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
