Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cedric Anderson v. Law Office of Timothy Martella, et al
as 18-55197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC L. ANDERSON, individually and as the parent, natural guardian and next friend on behalf of K.A., V.A., K.A., A.A., S.A., H.A., C.A. AND S.A
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY MARTELLA, TIMOTHY MARTELLA, RACHEL EWING and others
Cedric Anderson v. Law Office of Timothy Martella, et al
as 17-55230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC L. ANDERSON, individually and as the parent, natural guardian and next friend on behalf of K.A., V.A., K.A., A.A., S.A., H.A., C.A. AND S.A
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY MARTELLA, TIMOTHY MARTELLA, RACHEL EWING and others
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant:
1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Ross Shade, et al v. Ronald George, et al
as 09-16346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS S. SHADE and ESTATE OF MARY C. SHADE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, WILLIAM C. VICKERY, in his capacity as Administrative Director of Courts, MARY M. ROBERTS and others
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 3:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 4:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
