Cases 41 - 50 of 66
King-Daniels v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv11606
Plaintiff:
Nicole King-Daniels
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 2:2016cv10913
Plaintiff:
Otto T Williams
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chalice v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Chalice
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoy v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Hoy
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, NationStar Mortgage,LLC, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Braxton v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv10792
Plaintiff:
Christopher Braxton
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Ginnie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cherry v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 2:2016cv10742
Plaintiff:
Joyce M Cherry
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrington Mortgage Services v. Fall Oaks Farm LLC, et al
as 16-3186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, Successor by merger to Bank of America, N.A., Successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Defendant:
FALL OAKS FARM LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MODER
Watts et al v. Mortgage Bridge Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv10552
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watts and Royce Watts
Defendant:
Mortgage Bridge Solutions, LLC and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trudell v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv10441
Plaintiff:
Rodney Trudell
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
