Cases 21 - 30 of 37
GHULYANI v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv16511
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff:
AKASH GHULYANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAWTON et al
as 2:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID R. LAWTON, KATHLEEN R. LAWTON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF REVENUE, BUREAU OF COMPLIANCE, DEPT. 280948 and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
ROMAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
JASON ROMAN
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC , BANK OF AMERICA and DITECH FINANCIAL-GREEN TREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC v. FERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2016cv09586
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
MARIA LOURDES FERNANDEZ, SAMUEL TOMAS DIPINI, MARIA FERNANDEZ ROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALKER v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08330
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC , BANK OF AMERICA NA and PARKER MCCAY PA
Plaintiff:
DEANE V. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOOD v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2016cv03659
Plaintiff:
LEANE HOOD
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2604
SANTOS v. THE CARRINGTON COMPANIES, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03679
Plaintiff:
PEDRO SANTOS
Defendant:
THE CARRINGTON COMPANIES, LLC, CARRINGTON HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
