Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2023cv04187
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
MARILYNN ENGLISH, MR. OR MRS. ENGLISH, PARAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MAXWELL v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2021cv20693
Plaintiff:
SHARON MAXWELL
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ROSARIO v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03612
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff:
ODALIS ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARKSDALE et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv17544
Defendant:
Renee Hertzler, Susan Douglas, Michele Sjolander and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BARKSDALE, JR. and Trene Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MAY et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv14314
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAY and ADAM MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GHULYANI v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv16511
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff:
AKASH GHULYANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
