Cases 1 - 10 of 395
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Luckett v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Keith Luckett
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Easman, Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carter v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Nathanael James Carter, Jr
Defendant:
D. Murphy, Hayne, C. Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carter-Maddox v. California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Keith Reagan Carter-Maddox
Defendant:
California Substance Abuse Treatment and Facility and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Carter v. Randolph et al
as 1:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter
Defendant:
A. Randolph, M. Placencia and D. Barajas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrod Moten v. Paul L. Abrams et al
as 2:2023cv06359
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Paul L. Abrams, Patrick E. Connlley, David O. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter Kent Gorg v. Warden
as 8:2023cv01128
Petitioner:
Carter Kent Gorg
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Deegan v. Cueva, et al.
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ross Deegan, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Fox, Daniel E. Cueva, Jonnie Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
