Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MAIL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
MAIL TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CAUSLEY TRUCKING, INC. , FOREMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Tavarez v. Huancaya et al
as 1:2017cv01374
Defendant:
CBF Trucking Inc. and Juan Huancaya
Plaintiff:
Sandro Tavarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Michael Mickens v. CBF Trucking Inc
as 13-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
CBF TRUCKING INC, JAIME FINKLE and TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 701
MICKENS v. CBF TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03811
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MICKENS
Defendant:
CBF TRUCKING, INC. , JAMIE FINKLE , TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 701 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JEAN-PIERRE v. CBF TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06493
Plaintiff:
ALAIN JEAN-PIERRE
Defendant:
CBF TRUCKING, INC. , CLIFFORD B. FINKLE, JR., INC. , LOCAL 701 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ingram v. CBF Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08463
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Ingram
Defendant:
CBF Trucking, Inc. and Feliberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
International Brotherhood of T v. CBF Trucking Inc.
as 10-3044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 701
Defendant - Appellant:
CBF TRUCKING INC.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 701 v. CBF TRUCKING, INC.
as 3:2009cv05525
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 701
Defendant:
CBF TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hernandez v. CBF Trucking, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00317
Plaintiff:
Alexis De Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
CBF Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garcia v. Black et al
as 1:2008cv02536
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Garcia
Defendant:
Timothy Leroy Black and CBF Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
