Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bascom v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 2:2018cv01283
Defendant:
Sunny Casio, City of Henderson Fire Department, Robert Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Bascom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bascom v. United States Probation Office et al
as 2:2018cv01284
Defendant:
Sunny Casio, City of Henderson Fire Department, Robert Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Bascom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiber Research International, LLC v. North South Science, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02727
Defendant:
CCA Industries, Inc. and North South Science, LLC
Plaintiff:
Fiber Research International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Regina M. Florence v. EOS CCA
as 2:2016cv00785
Defendant:
EOS CCA
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Florence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mehmood v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., NSDC et al
as 2:2015cv01881
Respondent:
CCA, C. Collins, Chief Delaney and others
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mehmood v. Delaney et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Defendant:
11 Board of Governors, USPS, 12 Board Members, CCA, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
