Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cedric Johnson v. M. Spearman, et al
as 17-17451
Petitioner - Appellant:
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN and SHAWN HATTON, Warden
Cedric Johnson v. Soledad State Prison, et al
as 17-17116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOLEDAD STATE PRISON, LAMM, Dr., D. NANANIJO and others
Cedric Johnson v. Nerissa Huertas, et al
as 17-16034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NERISSA HUERTAS, Attorney - Sixth District Appellate Program, MONTEREY COUNTY, SEASIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cedric Johnson v. S. Hatton, et al
as 17-16023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HATTON, MARY JOHNSON MULHERN and B. MARTINEZ, CCI.
Cedric Johnson v. Evan George, et al
as 17-16022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EVAN GEORGE, Attorney, NERISSA KUNAKEMAKORN, Staff Attorney. Sixth District Appellate Program, MARIBEL FERREIRA, Attorney - Monterey County Public Defender's Office and others
Johnson v. Spearman
as 3:2017cv00872
Petitioner:
Cedric Chester Johnson
Respondent:
M. E. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Hatton et al
as 5:2016cv06665
Plaintiff:
Cedric Chester Johnson
Defendant:
S. Hatton, Mary Johnson Mulhern and B. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Huertas et al
as 5:2016cv05948
Plaintiff:
Cedric Chester Johnson
Defendant:
Nerissa Huertas, Monterey County, Seaside Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. George et al
as 5:2016cv05950
Plaintiff:
Cedric Chester Johnson
Defendant:
Evan George, Nerissa Kunakemakorn, Maribel Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CTF Soledad State Prison et al
as 3:2016cv05548
Plaintiff:
Cedric Chester Johnson
Defendant:
CTF Soledad State Prison and Lamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
