Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Bagby v. Hughes et al
as 5:2014cv00778
Defendant:
Clinton E. Averitte, David J. Bradley and Lynn N. Hughes
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Preska et al
as 5:2014cv00780
Defendant:
Clinton E. Averitte, B.A. Howell and Loretta A. Preska
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Atlas et al
as 5:2014cv00779
Defendant:
Nancy F. Atlas, David J. Bradley, Melinda Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. David,et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
G S David, D Glenn and Deana R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. David,et al
as 5:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
G. S. David, Deana R. Davis and D. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Dunn et al
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Nancy G. Dunn, Molly C. Dwyer and Joseph Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Harmon et al
as 5:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
David J. Bradley, Melinda Harmon, B. A. Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Rosenthal et al
as 5:2014cv00736
Defendant:
Clifton E. Averitte, David J. Bradley, Mary Lou Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. King et al
as 5:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Molly C. Dwyer, Chief Judge George H. King, Judge Donna M. Ryu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
as 3:2014cv02402
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
