Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Duffy v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Kent County, Kent County Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Duffy v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01673
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Allan Angel, Donald Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. City Of Wilmington et al
as 1:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Sharif Mozaar Mustafa El Bey
Defendant:
City Of Wilmington, Trinidad Navarro, Greg Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tani v. FPL/NextEnergy (FPL Capital Group Inc.) et al
as 1:2010cv00860
Plaintiff:
Kess Tani
Defendant:
FPL/NextEnergy (FPL Capital Group Inc.), Lewis Hay, III, Chairman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gadson v. CEO Noxell Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
CEO Noxell Corp., Noxell Bank Acct Treasurer, #42 Foreign Country Presidents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00914
Plaintiff:
Robert Vincent Gadson
Defendant:
United States of America, CEO Federal Reserve Bank, Board of Fed Gov DC HQ Fed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. CEO Venture Fund III LP
as 1:2008mc00235
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
CEO Venture Fund III LP
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type:
Other Statutes
Gadson v. CEO of Export and Import Bank of 10 Billion Dollars Dept of Commerce Bank Branch et al
as 1:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
CEO of Export and Import Bank of 10 Billion Dollars Dept of Commerce Bank Branch, President of Export and Import Bank of 10 Billion Dollars Dept of Commerce Bank Branch and Vice President of Export and Import Bank of 10 Billion Dollars Dept of Commerce Bank Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
