Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Crespo-Morales v. Caro-Delgado
as 23-1729
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN M. CRESPO-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
NICANOR CARO-DELGADO
Respondent:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ
Crespo-Morales v. Caro-Delgado
as 23-1638
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN M. CRESPO-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
NICANOR CARO-DELGADO
Respondent:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ
Alicea-Montalvo v. Mercado-Quinonez et al
as 3:2017cv01101
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Alicea-Montalvo
Defendant:
Nelson Mercado-Quinonez, Einar Ramos-Lopez, Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Filomeno-Cruz v. Soto, et al
as 16-1573
Petitioner - Appellant:
OBED FILOMENO-CRUZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ, as Secretary of Justice, ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ-MADERA, as Warden of Unit 448 of Bayamon Correction Facility, WALTER SOTO and others
Garcia-Torres v. Acevedo-Perez et al
as 3:2015cv02061
Plaintiff:
Jesus Garcia-Torres
Defendant:
Mariluz Acevedo-Perez and Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz-Colon v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2015cv01754
Defendant:
Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez, Jose B. Capo-Rivera, Department of Justice - Commonwealth of P.R. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ruiz-Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Pagan v. Mercado-Quinones et al
as 3:2015cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Perez-Pagan
Defendant:
Nelson Mercado-Quinones and Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz, et al v. Jimenez-Sanchez, et al
as 14-1847
Petitioner - Appellant:
A.B.O., Minor, MARTIZA ORTIZ and P.H.O, minor
Respondent - Appellee:
IDALIA COLON, CESAR R. MIRANDA RODRIGUEZ, Secretary of Justice and SONIA VELEZ
Interested Party:
NYDIA Z. JIMENEZ-SANCHEZ
Cruz-Berrios v. Borrero
as 3:2014cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jose Julian Cruz-Berrios
Defendant:
Lesty Borrero and Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
