Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Allen v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2017cv02571
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Davis
as 3:2016cv02766
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00075
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv03476
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Simmons et al
as 4:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Defendant:
T. Simmons, Sr, Lester, Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2008cv03536
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Alfred Janicek, Gene Wakefiled and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group et al
as 3:2008cv02128
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group and Diane Spadoni
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Reescano et al
as 9:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Defendant:
F Reescano, Warren G Oliver, David Sweeten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2007cv02302
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, A.C. Janicek, Cody Ginsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, A. C. Janicek, Cody Ginsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
