Cases 1 - 10 of 55
HUGHLEY v. FUNK et al
as 2:2026cv00313
Plaintiff:
RYAN LOGAN HUGHLEY
Defendant:
CHARLES FUNK, EMILY MEADOWS, COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTION CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FELL et al
as 2:2026cv00260
Plaintiff:
DERRICK T. MOORE
Defendant:
DEREK FELL, CHARLES FUNK and CASEY LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAFT v. FUNK et al
as 2:2026cv00245
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. CRAFT
Defendant:
CHARLES FUNK, DANIKA MITCHELL, SARHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEIDHAMER v. FUNK
as 2:2025cv00588
Plaintiff:
GERRY NEIDHAMER
Defendant:
CHARLES FUNK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. FELL et al
as 2:2025cv00523
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
DERK FELL, CHARLES FUNK and PINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FELL et al
as 2:2025cv00462
Plaintiff:
DAVONTE N. BROWN, AUSTIN GJ. BELL, DONALD E. BURNETT and others
Defendant:
DEREK FELL, CHARLES FUNK and LEE CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. FELL et al
as 2:2025cv00463
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. RILEY
Defendant:
DEREK FELL, CHARLES FUNK, BRIDGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. FELL et al
as 2:2025cv00443
Plaintiff:
JACK D. BARNETT, JR
Defendant:
DEREK FELL, CHARLES FUNK and FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEIDHAMER v. FUNK et al
as 2:2025cv00431
Plaintiff:
GERRY NEIDHAMER
Defendant:
CHARLES FUNK, EMILY MEADOWS, STEPHANIE EWARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOHAMED v. FELL et al
as 2:2025cv00427
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED NOOR MOHAMED
Defendant:
DERK FELL, CHARLES FUNK, T MCYNTIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
