Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Charles Kinney v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 17-16988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MARIANO FLORENTINO CUELLAR, CAROL A. CORRIGAN and others
Charles Kinney v. Frances Rothschild, et al
as 17-56356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCES ROTHSCHILD, VICTORIA CHENEY, JEFFREY JOHNSON and others
Charles Kinney v. Frances Rothschild et al
as 2:2017cv05342
Respondent:
Victoria Cheney, Eric Chomsky, Michele Clark and others
Petitioner:
Charles G Kinney
Charles Kinney v. Three Arch Bay Community Serv, et al
as 17-55899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THREE ARCH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CHARLES VIVIANI, JOHN CHALDU and others
Charles Kinney v. Clerk of California COA, 4th, et al
as 17-55081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLERK OF CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, Division Three, acting in an administrative capacity, KATHLEEN O'LEARY, Presiding Justice, Division Three, acting in a non-judicial capacity, JUDITH MCCONNELL, Admin. Presiding Jutice Fourth Appellate District, acting in a non-judicial capacity and others
Charles G. Kinney v. Clerk of California Court of Appeal Fourth Appellate District et al
as 8:2016cv02197
Defendant:
Clerk of California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Does, Judith McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Charles G Kinney
Charles Kinney v. Roger Boren, et al
as 16-17255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER W. BOREN and DAVID LANE
Charles Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez
as 16-56750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP GUTIERREZ
Charles Kinney v. Tyson Takeuchi, et al
as 16-56733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
TYSON TAKEUCHI and MICHELE CLARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
