Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Hamilton v. Khare. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 15-2283. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2015mc02283
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Dinesh Chandra Khare
Hamilton v. Freeman et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Antoine L Freeman, Joyce M Guy and Edward McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fields vs. McKesson Corporation
as CAN/4:13-cv-03050
Plaintiff:
James Fields , Robert Ford , Richard Fulkerson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Louis Hamilton, II v. USA, et al
as 12-40403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of all other African American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President and RUTHERFORD B. HAYES
Hamilton v. U S America
as 1:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
U S America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Louis Hamilton, II v. Willie Zanders, et al
as 11-40839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE M ZANDERS, Attorney at Law, WALTER A. DENNIS and ROSEMARY DENNIS
Hamilton v. UPS, et al
as 1:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
UPS and CVS/Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al
as 11-20216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C. and others
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States of America, State Of Texas and Harris County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Zanders et al
as 1:2011cv00005
Defendant:
Walter A Dennis, Willie M Zanders and Rosemary Dennis
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
