Cases 1 - 10 of 232
BARTLEY v. WARREN
as 1:2023cv21483
Plaintiff:
EUGENE B. BARTLEY, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv20103
Plaintiff:
STEPHON WHITFIELD
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and NURSE OLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZELLER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
TERRY R ZELLER, JR
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and NURSE HYDEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIEDERBERGER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
LUKE C. NIEDERBERGER
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and CFG MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN ALLEN
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and EVELYN OLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
TARRENCE JERMANE HEARD
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX. WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX. MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
HENRIQUES DOUGLAS
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX-WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX-MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv06707
Plaintiff:
HENRIQUES DOUGLAS
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, ROBERT SMITH and KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERWOOD v. WARREN
as 1:2022cv06387
Plaintiff:
KELVIN L. UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
