Cases 81 - 90 of 245
USA v. Dequillarae Zellou
as 13-4232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEQUILLARAE ZELLOUS, aka Rae Zellous, aka Strong, aka Charles Brown, aka Daryl Lewis, aka Dequillarae Zellows, aka Charles Warren
WILLIAMS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv05845
Petitioner:
BARRY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARUSO v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv05837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARUSO
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CHARLES ALBINO, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENTER v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv05758
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MENTER
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DASILVA v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv05373
Petitioner:
LUIS DASILVA
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PLANKER v. CHRISTIE, et al
as 3:2013cv04464
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PLANKER
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, GARY LANIGAN, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEALS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04398
Petitioner:
TIVON E. NEALS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04334
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, KENNETH NELSEN, JIMMY BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WARREN
as 2:2013cv04304
Petitioner:
YUSEF ALLEN
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv04250
Petitioner:
WILLIE PETERSON
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
