Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company v. Chartis Casualty Company
as 5:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Chartis Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
BrickStreet Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talkington v. Columbian Chemicals Company
as 5:2014cv00166
Defendant:
AIG Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Columbian Chemicals Company and Marissa L. Talkington
3Rd Party Defendant:
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Fitzsimmons Law Firm PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Draughn v. Harman et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Draughn
Defendant:
Shelby L. Harman , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA and Chartis Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Watson v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 5:2013cv01939
Plaintiff:
John D. Watson
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA and Chartis Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Barth et al v. AIG Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv05121
Plaintiff:
Amber N. Barth , Richard Carnefix and Tarah B. Carnefix
Defendant:
AIG Life Insurance Company and Chartis Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Harding v. Chartis Claims Inc.
as 5:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Harding
Defendant:
Chartis Claims Inc. , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. and Lotsolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chartis Property Casualty Company v. Bordas et al
as 5:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Chartis Property Casualty Company
Defendant:
James G. Bordas, Jr. and Linda M. Bordas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith vs. Kanawha River Terminals LLC, et al.
as 3:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Smith
Defendant:
Kanawha River Terminals LLC and Kanawha River Terminals, Inc.
Claimant:
AIG/Chartis
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 USC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
