Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barbara S. Harper et al v. Chase Bank USA N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv04826
Plaintiff:
Barbara S. Harper and Ryan J. Harper
Defendant:
Chase Issuance Trust, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Chase Bank USA N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Moore, et al v. Chase Bank USA, et al
as 11-80125
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL E. MOORE, CHRISTIAN LOVIN, SCOTT MILLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHASE BANK USA and CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST
DURANT v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2009cv03790
Plaintiff:
PEGGY DURANT
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. and Chase Issuance Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
GLENSY et al v. CHASE BANK USA, NA et al
as 3:2009cv02963
Plaintiff:
REX GLENSY, REX GLENSY, REX GLENSY and others
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, NA and Chase Issuance Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
GLENSY et al v. CHASE BANK USA, NA et al
as 3:2009cv05963
Plaintiff:
REX GLENSY, REX GLENSY, REX GLENSY and others
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, NA and Chase Issuance Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In Re: Chase Bank USA, N.A. "Check Loan" Contract Litigation
as 3:2009md02032
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Moore, Diane M. Rooney, Christian Lovin and others
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, Chase Issuance Trust, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. and others
Interested Party:
Gregory P. Scialdone
Not Classified By Court:
Elizabeth A Miller and Mr Gregory P Scialdone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURANT v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv02114
Plaintiff:
PEGGY DURANT
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, N.A. and CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
GLENSY et al v. CHASE BANK USA, NA et al
as 1:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
REX GLENSY and DONNA BORGEOIS
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, NA and CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
