Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Macias v. Capital Management Amityville, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02213
Defendant:
Capital Management Amityville, Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Peter O'Hara and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Macias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Macias v. Capital Management Amityville, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02213
Defendant:
Capital Management Amityville, Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Peter O'Hara and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Macias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trisvan v. Kalex Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09917
Plaintiff:
John Trisvan
Defendant:
Kalex Partners, LLC and Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trisvan v. Kalex Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07000
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. and Kalex Partners, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Trisvan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh et al v. John Doe Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01383
Plaintiff:
Balkar Singh
Defendant:
John Doe Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Enrique Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04543
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. and Checkers/Rallys National Production Fund, Inc.
Plaintiff:
"Juan" Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04804
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
