Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. AKINS et al
as 2:2018cv17061
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN CLAVO, EDWARD AKINS and JOSUE VAZQUEZ
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN ARCHDIOCESE OF NORTH AMERICA v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv13100
Defendant:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NEW JERSEY and ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Plaintiff:
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN ARCHDIOCESE OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSCUFO v. LONG BEACH TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN J. MOSCUFO
Defendant:
LONG BEACH TOWNSHIP, BRENDAN M. KERLIN, THOMAS V. RUBEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
DIEZ v. ERVELLI et al
as 2:2016cv08703
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIEZ
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ERVELLI , RICHARD ALAM , M.J. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DE SAPIO PROPERTIES #SIX, INC. et al v. ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2016cv05770
Plaintiff:
DE SAPIO PROPERTIES #SIX, INC. and DELAWARE RIVER TUBING, INC.
Defendant:
ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP , R. CHRISTIAN PFEFFERLE , PAUL ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REYES v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2016cv02627
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN REYES
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, JOHN DITARANTO, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
