Cases 41 - 50 of 68
COWLES v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, N.J. et al
as 2:2013cv03222
Plaintiff:
ROGER E. COWLES
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH, N.J., POLICE DEPARTMENT FIREARMS LICENSING EMPLOYEE LARON MURRAY, FORMER CHIEF OF POLICE RONALD P. SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAIM et al v. NEEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
SHARON BEN HAIM, SOL HAVIVI and GAMLIEL ELMALEM
Defendant:
YAAKOV NEEMAN, MOSHE KACHLON, EDNA ARBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRESKO et al v. CRITCHLEY, et al
as 2:2011cv06907
Plaintiff:
LAURA BRESKO and JOAN BRESKO
Defendant:
THOMAS CRITCHLEY , CATHERINE ENRIGHT , RENATE BRESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATOCHE v. UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04332
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ATOCHE
Defendant:
UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF
Counter_claimant:
UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Counter_defendant:
CHRISTIAN ATOCHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
