Cases 1 - 10 of 22
TROY et al v. KUHN
as 1:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN TROY, JAVON HALL, ALDO NAVAS and others
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ENTO v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2022cv07355
Plaintiff:
Christian David Ento
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and THE STATE OF NEBRASKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv12482
Defendant:
MARCUS O HICKS, PATRICK NOGAN, WARREN ZALME and others
Plaintiff:
ALAMEEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITT v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2020cv14678
Defendant:
SIDNEY GIDDONS, RICHARD SMITH, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LOURENZO WITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGES v. FIOIRE et al
as 2:2020cv13561
Plaintiff:
ASHELY GEORGES
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN PORROVECCHIO, CINDY SWEENEY, JAMES SLAUGHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv12031
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv10363
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN BEY v. CHRISTIAN UNION COURTROOM
as 1:2018cv14517
Plaintiff:
LEON GREEN BEY
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN UNION COURTROOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES et al
as 2:2017cv02971
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES , DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES , JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06104
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
