Cases 1 - 10 of 3,156
Reger v. Beason et al
as 1:2024cv04624
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reger
Defendant:
Albert Beason and Magnum, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peoples v. McManus et al
as 1:2024cv04564
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Peoples
Defendant:
Deputy McManus and Sgt. Reinhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Odle v. GameStop Corp. d/b/a GameStop, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odle
Defendant:
GameStop Corp. doing business as GameStop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
USA v. Grain Densification International LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Grain Densification International LLC and Christopher Dorr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Applicability of chapter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
